Question

 Why isn't Wikipeadia a 'Credible' source?

Answer I believe the reason that Wikipedia isn't allowed as a source is because of its nature as an encyclopedia rather than firsthand research. Wikipedia contains articles written based on authors' inter... Read More »
http://answers.yahoo.com//question/index?qid=20081115074424AA934lp

Top Q&A For: Why isn't Wikipeadia a 'Credible' source

Is wikipedia a credible source?

No, Wikipedia is not a credible source.However, you probably won't find "any pages that are bogus and full of errors" unless you specifically set out to find them. More likely you will find (and ha... Read More »
http://answers.yahoo.com//question/index?qid=20100516152937AAlMUK3

Is Wikipedia a credible and reliable source ?

Yes and No. It is a reliable source because there is a lot of great information on the website for some topics. On the other hand the information is submitted by regular people and some times peopl... Read More »
http://answers.yahoo.com//question/index?qid=20090303180803AAlGFqc

Do you think wikipedia is a credible source of information?

When I attended college the first source my Professor said not to trust is wikipedia. It is an open source of info allowing anyone to enter facts, delete facts, and enter information without citing... Read More »
http://answers.yahoo.com//question/index?qid=20080111013724AAD7hVr

Frank' ly speaking -- why would anyone use the WHO as a credible source?

That is a good question. Suddenly the anti-alts consider the WHO a credible source? When I used the WHO as a source, the anti-alt crowd was quick to point out how politicized and unreliable they w... Read More »
http://answers.yahoo.com//question/index?qid=20100126153540AAajQ7Y


feedback
loading