Question

 Why is wikipedia not a valid reference?

Answer Wikipedia is not a valid source because it does not have review for publication. When a traditional reference source publishes some work, they (in theory) have someone check over the article for mi... Read More »
http://answers.yahoo.com//question/index?qid=20090925130833AAzwd5m

Top Q&A For: Why is wikipedia not a valid reference

Wikipedia: a valid source?

Not outraged at all. Search engines should off work off relevance, popularity, and how recent an article is. Wikipedia articles meet those criteria quite well.What do you mean by "valid"? If valid ... Read More »
http://answers.yahoo.com//question/index?qid=20080612122530AAPi015

Why is Wikipedia not a valid source?

Wikipedia should not be used as a cited source for two very good reasons:1. It is not peer reviewed before publication. Especially including the fact that most people can edit, this is a major prob... Read More »
http://answers.yahoo.com//question/index?qid=20090511152328AA4BsVG

Can Wikipedia become a valid source?

I am going to answer this question as a teacher. When we tell students not to use Wikipedia as a source, it is because it is always changing. A reliable source remains constant. Granted, someone... Read More »
http://answers.yahoo.com//question/index?qid=20080219121707AAonmkf

Can I trust wikipedia How do I know if it is valid or not?

No, you can't trust Wikipedia. The only way you can know a particular article is valid or not is by actually being an expert on the subject or at least having done your own research into the topic.... Read More »
http://answers.yahoo.com//question/index?qid=20100906120843AAVCuL5


feedback
loading