Question

 Is Wikipedia considered an unreliable website source in general (if so, why)?

Answer For general purposes, it is a pretty handy and reliable place to go for your information. For academic purpose, not so much. The main reason for its unreliability is the fact that almost anyone can... Read More »
http://answers.yahoo.com//question/index?qid=20120623192447AAFVwu3

Top Q&A For: Is Wikipedia considered an unreliable website s...

I heard wikipedia in an unreliable source. is that true?

Anyone can write into wiki whether they know the answer or not. There is NO need for objectivity."More reliable than an encyclopedia" is a nonsensical statement especially if you want bias and opin... Read More »
http://answers.yahoo.com//question/index?qid=20070613162001AAtzoix

If Wikipedia is considered an "unreliable sorce", why do we still use it?

I read a paper a while ago that really answered this question well for me. Don Fallis, of the School of Information Resources and Library Science at the University of Arizona, wrote a paper called ... Read More »
http://answers.yahoo.com//question/index?qid=20100108221820AApE8e4

Give me a valid argument about how Wikipedia is unreliable as a source of information?

Anyone can go on there and write whatever they want...some teachers give half credit if a student used it for information in their report...once my brother used it, and it said that Charles Dickens... Read More »
http://answers.yahoo.com//question/index?qid=20090209104321AA1TbMn

Is wikipedia REALLY that unreliable It seems to be the only website i can actually understand?

Personally I love Wikipedia & every time I use some of their information on papers & essays, I get A's. They have loads of employees working on the pages so people can't put fictional statements.
http://answers.yahoo.com//question/index?qid=20090215180921AABOpWj


feedback
loading