Question

 If Wikipedia is considered an "unreliable sorce", why do we still use it?

Answer I read a paper a while ago that really answered this question well for me. Don Fallis, of the School of Information Resources and Library Science at the University of Arizona, wrote a paper called ... Read More »
http://answers.yahoo.com//question/index?qid=20100108221820AApE8e4

Top Q&A For: If Wikipedia is considered an "unreliable sorce...

Is Wikipedia considered an unreliable website source in general (if so, why)?

For general purposes, it is a pretty handy and reliable place to go for your information. For academic purpose, not so much. The main reason for its unreliability is the fact that almost anyone can... Read More »
http://answers.yahoo.com//question/index?qid=20120623192447AAFVwu3

Is wikipedia a reliable sorce?

NO ,NOT AT ALL,IT lost its credibility bcoz of poor and unscholarly admin.
http://answers.yahoo.com//question/index?qid=20080330105034AA2sXIQ

Is Wikipedia unreliable?

It all depends on what you're looking for. The reliability of an article on Wikipedia is inversely proportional to its relevance or usefulness in the real world.For example, "Physics of the Dragon... Read More »
http://answers.yahoo.com//question/index?qid=20120221154011AAdyeaZ

Is wikipedia "that" unreliable?

Everyone saying it is full of lies should provide sources for this ;)Wikipedia's accuracy heavily depends on the reliability of the sources that are used (or sometimes, not used) to write an articl... Read More »
http://answers.yahoo.com//question/index?qid=20120828154536AAn8UX5


feedback
loading